Home / Compare
Compare: a record, a consultant or a spreadsheet
An honest comparison, including when this product is the wrong choice.
| This record | A consultant | A spreadsheet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | USD 799 once, or free to read | Usually five figures and weeks | Free, and your time |
| Speed | Immediate | Weeks to first draft | Immediate to start, slow to finish |
| Source trail | Every row cited | Depends on the firm | Whatever you paste in |
| Judgement about your estate | None; it reads your answers | Yes, if you brief it well | None |
| Kept current | Refresh script and watch | Only if you retain them | Only if you maintain it |
| Certifies you | No | No, unless they are a certification body | No |
When this product is the wrong choice
If you need a legal opinion on whether a regime requires the standard, use a lawyer. If your estate is large enough that the inventory itself is a programme, use a consultant or an internal team, and use this record as the source list. If you already hold a current, reviewed mapping, you do not need it.
Where it is the right choice
When you need the clause set, the evidence list and a dated plan in one place, quickly, with every line checkable, and when a committee needs a document rather than a wiki page. That is the gap the kit fills.
Not legal advice; does not certify.