Home / The record / Mechanisms based on identities
Clause 4
Identity based mechanisms, the FS and GQ1 schemes
This family lets a verifier check that a claimant knows private keys tied to its identification data. It covers the Fiat-Shamir and Guillou-Quisquater schemes, and it is the family whose cost is a short modular exponentiation with a challenge size that has to be chosen rather than inherited.
- What it asks
- For each identity based deployment, record the scheme, the modulus arrangement and the challenge size, and show that the challenge size was chosen for the workload. A default challenge size copied from a sample is a finding, not a configuration.
- What the revision does
- The fourth edition keeps the family and will restate its security requirements and key production. The public record does not disclose the clause-level changes. The 2009 wording is therefore superseded at publication.
- Who it binds
- The owner of the identity platform and the security architect who approved the scheme.
- Evidence an auditor samples
- The scheme and challenge size per deployment (configuration management database)
- The workload calculation behind the challenge size (capacity plan)
- The test that shows the verifier rejects a wrong response (test suite)
- The test you can run
- Ask why the challenge size is what it is. If the answer is that it came with the library, the choice has not been made.
- Common failures
- The challenge size is left at a library default with no workload note.
- Two deployments use different schemes under one product name.
- How to close it
- Write the challenge size, the workload it implies and the date it was reviewed into the deployment record. The number is small; the reasoning is the evidence. The artefact that opens the work is the scheme and challenge size per deployment; the row is only closed when that artefact is dated and has a person against it.
- Where it sits against the 2009 edition
- Clause 4 is a 2009 clause that the revision replaces. For Clause 4, the 2009 obligation is the one to evidence until publication; after it, this row is rebuilt against the published text.
For the file, this row closes when the scheme and challenge size per deployment exists with a date, a named holder and a pointer, and when the test above has been run and recorded. The owner of the identity platform and the security architect who approved the scheme. owns that answer for Clause 4.